← Back to feed
ScienceJun 1372% confidenceConfidence 72% — the share of independent, credible sources corroborating the core facts.

New Study Proposes 'Geometric Clock' to Explain Why Time May Not Exist Everywhere in the Universe

Center 100%
1 source

A Brazilian physicist has published a study in Classical and Quantum Gravity arguing that time is tied to the curvature of space and may lose meaning in flatter regions of the universe. The research attempts to address the longstanding 'problem of time,' a conflict arising from how time is treated differently in general relativity versus quantum physics. If supported by further research, the theory could offer a new framework for reconciling two of physics' most fundamental but incompatible theories.

Anderson Gama Fernandes de Freitas of the Universidade Federal de Itajubá in Brazil has proposed a 'geometric clock'—a mathematical construct based on the curvature of three-dimensional spatial slices—that determines whether time can function as a meaningful ordering parameter. In highly curved regions of space, such as those present just after the Big Bang, the clock is rigid and time behaves as standard physics predicts. However, as the universe expands and space flattens, the geometric clock winds down, and time gradually loses its operational meaning. The study addresses the 'problem of time,' a dilemma originating from the 1967 Wheeler-DeWitt equation, which attempted to reconcile general relativity and quantum mechanics but produced a formulation with no time variable. Fernandes de Freitas argues that time is 'neither fundamental nor universally available,' and that his framework offers testable predictions rather than purely philosophical speculation. The author acknowledges, however, that the theory has only been tested on simplified cosmological models, leaving significant work ahead before it could be considered a viable path toward a unified theory of physics.

Limitations & open questions

The study's own limitations are significant: the geometric clock framework has only been validated on simplified cosmological models, and it remains unclear how the theory would perform under more complex or realistic conditions.

What different sources said

Related

ScienceConfidence 92% — the share of independent, credible sources corroborating the core facts.

Nobel Laureates Rebut Study Claiming Universe's Expansion Is Slowing, Confirm Acceleration Continues

An international team of astrophysicists, including Nobel laureates Adam Riess and Brian Schmidt, has published a study in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society confirming that the universe's expansion is still accelerating. The rebuttal targets a late-2024 South Korean study that had claimed dark energy was weakening, a finding that would have overturned nearly three decades of cosmological understanding. The new study identifies two specific methodological errors in the earlier work, restoring confidence in the standard model of cosmic acceleration while leaving the deeper mystery of what dark energy actually is unresolved.

2 sourcesJun 13
ScienceConfidence 91% — the share of independent, credible sources corroborating the core facts.

Study Finds Trees May Store Less Carbon Than Climate Models Predict

A new study published in Science Advances found that oak trees stop growing months before they stop photosynthesizing, meaning increased carbon uptake does not necessarily translate into more wood growth and long-term carbon storage. Researchers analyzed 137 sites across the US, finding that 26–36% of annual carbon uptake occurred after tree growth had already ceased, with drought and heat identified as key triggers for halting growth. The findings suggest that widely used climate models, which assume photosynthesis and growth are tightly linked, may be overestimating forests' future capacity to sequester carbon.

2 sourcesJun 13
ScienceConfidence 91% — the share of independent, credible sources corroborating the core facts.

San Andreas Fault Stress Reaches Highest Level in 1,000 Years, Study Finds

A new peer-reviewed study finds that tectonic stress on Southern California's San Andreas and San Jacinto fault systems has reached its highest levels in at least 1,000 years, with the San Jacinto-Bernardino section measuring 3.6 megapascals. The research, led by the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa and published in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, used a computer model drawing on geological data including radiocarbon dating and tree-ring records to reconstruct a millennium of earthquake history. The findings cannot predict when a major earthquake will occur but are intended to improve hazard assessments, inform building codes, and guide emergency preparedness in a region home to millions.

2 sourcesJun 13