New 'Doginburgh' Test Measures Dogs' Left or Right Paw Preference

Researchers at the University of Bari in Italy have published a new four-task assessment called the 'Doginburgh Inventory' to determine whether dogs are left-pawed, right-pawed, or ambilateral, with the study appearing in Royal Society Open Science. The test adapts the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory from human psychology and combines two manipulation tasks (a Kong toy test and a food-reaching test) with two locomotion tasks (stair descent and curb stepping) to produce a single scored category across five levels of paw preference. Understanding canine laterality matters because paw preference has been linked to differences in behavior, stress responses, emotional processing, and cognitive abilities, with potential applications in training and selecting working or service dogs.
A team led by Marcello Siniscalchi and co-author Sevim Isparta at the University of Bari Aldo Moro has introduced the 'Doginburgh Inventory,' a standardized multi-task tool for assessing paw preference in dogs, published June 10, 2026 in Royal Society Open Science. The inventory was modeled on the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory, a psychological tool measuring human hand dominance since the early 1970s, and classifies dogs into five categories: strong left-pawed, weak left-pawed, ambilateral, weak right-pawed, and strong right-pawed. The four tasks — a Kong toy stabilization test, a treat-reaching test conducted at home, a stair-descent test, and a curb-stepping test during a leashed walk — were administered to 43 healthy family dogs of various breeds aged 1 to 10. Scores are calculated using a laterality index formula (R−L)/(R+L), converted to a quotient between −100 and 100, and then weighted by a consistency score across all four tests to yield a final paw-preference category. Of the 43 dogs assessed, 11 strongly preferred their left paw, 3 strongly preferred their right, and the remainder fell in between, with no population-wide directional bias comparable to the roughly 90 percent right-handedness seen in humans. Researchers note that dogs often switch preferred paws depending on the task, which is precisely why a multi-test inventory is considered more reliable than any single assessment. The study is described as a proof of concept, with plans to expand the number of tasks and test larger, more diverse dog populations; the researchers also hope pet owners worldwide will use the scoring method to build a large dataset analogous to what exists for human handedness.
Data: Article/study on the Doginburgh Inventory
Limitations & open questions
The study's own limitations include a small, convenience sample of 43 dogs, which limits generalizability across breeds, ages, and working versus companion dog populations. The paper is a proof of concept and has not yet been validated against neuroimaging or other independent measures of brain lateralization, so the link between the inventory score and underlying neural asymmetry remains assumed rather than directly demonstrated. It is also unclear whether the at-home food-reaching test is sufficiently standardized across different home environments to yield comparable results.
What different sources said
- Scientific AmericanCenter
How to tell if your dog is left-pawed or right-pawed, according to science
- 3AWCenter
‘Left pawness and right pawness’: New research reveals dogs can show single-sided preference similar to humans
- Phys.orgCenter
Is your dog a lefty? New 'Doginburgh' test captures paw preference
- The TimesCenter
Is your dog a southpaw? Male dogs share men’s tendency to be lefties
- Smithsonian MagazineCenter
Is Your Dog Right-Pawed or Left-Pawed? Here's How to Figure It Out, According to a New Study
Related

Nobel Laureates Rebut Study Claiming Universe's Expansion Is Slowing, Confirm Acceleration Continues
An international team of astrophysicists, including Nobel laureates Adam Riess and Brian Schmidt, has published a study in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society confirming that the universe's expansion is still accelerating. The rebuttal targets a late-2024 South Korean study that had claimed dark energy was weakening, a finding that would have overturned nearly three decades of cosmological understanding. The new study identifies two specific methodological errors in the earlier work, restoring confidence in the standard model of cosmic acceleration while leaving the deeper mystery of what dark energy actually is unresolved.

Study Finds Trees May Store Less Carbon Than Climate Models Predict
A new study published in Science Advances found that oak trees stop growing months before they stop photosynthesizing, meaning increased carbon uptake does not necessarily translate into more wood growth and long-term carbon storage. Researchers analyzed 137 sites across the US, finding that 26–36% of annual carbon uptake occurred after tree growth had already ceased, with drought and heat identified as key triggers for halting growth. The findings suggest that widely used climate models, which assume photosynthesis and growth are tightly linked, may be overestimating forests' future capacity to sequester carbon.

San Andreas Fault Stress Reaches Highest Level in 1,000 Years, Study Finds
A new peer-reviewed study finds that tectonic stress on Southern California's San Andreas and San Jacinto fault systems has reached its highest levels in at least 1,000 years, with the San Jacinto-Bernardino section measuring 3.6 megapascals. The research, led by the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa and published in the Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, used a computer model drawing on geological data including radiocarbon dating and tree-ring records to reconstruct a millennium of earthquake history. The findings cannot predict when a major earthquake will occur but are intended to improve hazard assessments, inform building codes, and guide emergency preparedness in a region home to millions.