Ben & Jerry's Co-Founder Battles Owner Magnum Over Brand's Social Activism
Ben Cohen, co-founder of Ben & Jerry's, is campaigning to make the ice cream brand independent from its owner Magnum (part of Unilever), claiming the company is suppressing the brand's ability to criticize political figures and social issues. The dispute centers on Ben & Jerry's long-standing identity as a values-driven company that speaks out on social justice, which Cohen says Magnum is undermining. The conflict highlights tensions between corporate ownership and brand activism, with over 130,000 people supporting Cohen's campaign.
Ben Cohen, who co-founded Ben & Jerry's in 1978, is leading a "Free Ben & Jerry's" campaign against Magnum Ice Cream Company (owned by Unilever), alleging the parent company is destroying the brand by preventing it from criticizing political figures, particularly US President Donald Trump. Cohen claims this muzzling contradicts the brand's core identity as a progressive voice for social justice. The dispute escalated when Ben & Jerry's independent board filed a lawsuit over restrictions on speaking about the Gaza conflict, and six of nine board members resigned after retroactive nine-year term limits were imposed. Magnum disputes Cohen's characterization, stating Ben & Jerry's remains a "bold voice for social justice" and has recently spoken out on multiple issues including ICE, Iran, and refugee justice. The brand, which generated €1.1 billion in revenue for Unilever's ice cream unit in 2024, has operated under an unusual governance structure since Unilever's 2000 acquisition, where an independent board was meant to safeguard its social mission. Cohen's campaign has garnered support from over 130,000 people, while co-founder Jerry Greenfield resigned in September after nearly 50 years, citing loss of independence.
What's missing
The specific details of what statements or campaigns Magnum allegedly prevented Ben & Jerry's from making (beyond the Gaza conflict reference) are not fully documented in these sources. Additionally, Magnum's detailed rationale for the governance changes and term limits is not extensively covered.
What different sources said
- The Straits TimesCenter
Ben & Jerry’s co-founder says brand being ‘destroyed’ by Magnum
- BloombergCenter
Ben & Jerry’s Co-Founder’s War Against Big Ice Cream
Related
UK Competition Authority Investigates Ryanair Over Mandatory Parental Seating Fees
The UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has launched an investigation into Ryanair over charges it imposes on parents to sit next to their children on flights, typically costing £8 per flight. The airline's terms require at least one parent to sit with children aged 2-11 through a mandatory paid "family seat" reservation, which the CMA is examining as potentially unfair under consumer law. The investigation is part of broader efforts to protect consumers and address cost-of-living pressures, with the CMA examining whether parents are being charged for obligations the airline should meet under aviation safety rules.
Vaibhav Sooryavanshi's explosive 44 off 22 balls powers India A to 161/2 against Afghanistan A
India A reached 161/2 in 20 overs against Afghanistan A in a Tri-Nation Series match in Sri Lanka, with 15-year-old Vaibhav Sooryavanshi scoring 44 off 22 balls at a strike rate of 200 before being dismissed. Sooryavanshi's aggressive batting in the powerplay helped India A race to 50 without loss in five overs, establishing a strong foundation for the innings. The young talent's performance continues to draw attention as a promising prospect, though his early dismissal left observers speculating about what a longer stay could have achieved.
Thai court sentences two men to death for 2015 Bangkok shrine bombing
A Thai court on Thursday sentenced two ethnic Uyghur men, Bilal Mohammed and Yusufu Mieraili, to death for the August 2015 bombing of Bangkok's Erawan shrine that killed 20 people. The attack was the deadliest bombing in Thailand's history and wounded over 100 others; the defendants have maintained their innocence throughout the 11-year trial. The verdict concludes a long-delayed case that faced multiple disruptions including translator issues and military custody complications.