Yes, Some Republicans Tried to Expunge Trump's Impeachments — But It Failed and Likely Can't Work
“A plan is in the works to expunge Trump's impeachment”
The argument in brief
The claim that a plan is in the works to expunge Trump's impeachments is partially true but misleading. House Republicans did introduce and vote on expungement resolutions in 2023, but both failed. More importantly, constitutional scholars and the Congressional Research Service agree there is no legal mechanism to actually remove a presidential impeachment from the record.
Why it spread
This story resonated strongly with Trump supporters who see the impeachments as politically motivated and want to see them undone. The idea of a reversal feels like justice to that audience. At the same time, it sparked outrage among opponents, making it emotionally charged on both sides — exactly the kind of story that gets shared fast and fact-checked slowly.
It's true that some House Republicans pushed to expunge Donald Trump's two impeachments from the congressional record. Resolutions were introduced, debated, and brought to a vote. But calling this a viable "plan in the works" overstates what actually happened — and ignores what the Constitution says about it.
In July 2023, the House voted on both expungement resolutions. Both failed, as reported by NPR and The Washington Post. The votes split largely along party lines, but notably even some Republicans voted against them, citing concerns about constitutional validity and the precedent it would set.
More fundamentally, the effort was always on shaky legal ground. The Congressional Research Service — Congress's own nonpartisan research body — found there is no established constitutional or procedural mechanism to expunge a presidential impeachment. Impeachment is a constitutional process, and a later resolution simply cannot nullify it. PolitiFact confirmed that legal and constitutional scholars broadly agree on this point.
So even if the votes had passed, the impeachments would almost certainly still stand as a matter of constitutional law. Passing a resolution calling something expunged is not the same as it actually being expunged. The historical record, and the legal one, would remain intact.
This claim spread because it was partly real — there genuinely were votes — which gave it enough truth to travel. But the gap between "some lawmakers tried this" and "a real plan is underway" is significant. When you see political news framed around efforts that already failed or lack legal teeth, it's worth checking whether the story is about what happened or what someone wished would happen.
Sources
- CNN Politics
Some House Republicans introduced resolutions to expunge Trump's two impeachments from the congressional record, but these efforts did not advance to a full House vote and lacked broad support.
- NPR
In July 2023, the House voted on resolutions to expunge Trump's impeachments, but the measures failed. The votes largely fell along party lines and did not succeed in removing the impeachments from the record.
- Congressional Research Service
There is no established constitutional or procedural mechanism to formally expunge a presidential impeachment from the official congressional record. Impeachment is a constitutional process and its historical record cannot be legally nullified by a later resolution.
- PolitiFact
Legal and constitutional scholars broadly agree that Congress lacks the authority to retroactively expunge a presidential impeachment, as the Constitution does not provide such a mechanism.
- The Washington Post
The House voted on expungement resolutions in 2023, but both failed. Even some Republicans voted against the measures, citing concerns about constitutional validity and precedent.
Related debunks
- Partially FalseNo, Tren de Aragua Did Not Operate Under Maduro's Direct Control — Here's What the Evidence Actually Shows
- UnverifiableYes, US Intelligence Contradicted Claims That Maduro Controls Tren de Aragua — Here's What the Assessment Actually Found
- FalseNo, US Southern Command Did Not Kill Tren de Aragua's Leader in an Airstrike — Venezuelan Forces Did