TellWell
…
← Misinformation tracker
UnverifiableNews · Politics

Yes, Jamie Raskin Did Push to Use the 14th Amendment Against Trump — Here's What He Actually Did

“Rep. Jamie Raskin made efforts to invoke the 14th Amendment against Trump's candidacy”

The argument in brief

The claim is true. Rep. Jamie Raskin introduced resolutions, gave floor speeches, and co-authored public arguments calling for Trump's disqualification under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which bars people who engaged in insurrection from holding federal office. The effort ultimately failed after the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in March 2024 that only Congress, not individual states, could enforce that provision against federal candidates.

Why it spread

This story spread because it sits at the intersection of three deeply polarizing topics: Trump's fitness for office, the January 6 attack, and constitutional law. People on both sides had strong reasons to share it — Trump supporters as evidence of political persecution, critics as evidence of accountability efforts. That kind of dual-audience appeal turbocharges sharing, regardless of whether the underlying facts are accurate.

The claim that Rep. Jamie Raskin made active efforts to invoke the 14th Amendment against Donald Trump's candidacy is straightforwardly true and well-documented in the public record. This is not a matter of interpretation or spin — it happened, and Raskin was open about it.

Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, passed after the Civil War, bars anyone who engaged in insurrection against the United States from holding federal office. Starting in 2023, Raskin became one of the most prominent voices in Congress arguing that Trump's role in the January 6, 2021 Capitol attack triggered that provision. According to NPR and the Washington Post, he co-authored op-eds, delivered House floor speeches, and made the legal case in public forums repeatedly.

Raskin did not stop at rhetoric. Politico reported that he introduced a formal House resolution calling on Congress to officially declare Trump disqualified under Section 3. The Congressional Record also shows he introduced related legislation in the 118th Congress. These were concrete legislative actions, not just talking points.

The strongest counterpoint is that none of it worked. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously in Trump v. Anderson in March 2024 that states cannot unilaterally enforce Section 3 against federal candidates — only Congress can. That ruling effectively shut down all the legal challenges to Trump's ballot eligibility, including the efforts Raskin had championed. His push was real; its outcome was a dead end.

This claim circulates in both directions — sometimes as an attack on Raskin for overreach, sometimes as praise for his persistence. Because it involves Trump, January 6, and constitutional law all at once, it gets pulled into broader partisan arguments. The facts themselves, though, are not in dispute. Raskin tried, the courts said no, and the story ended there.

Sources

  • U.S. House of Representatives Congressional Record

    Rep. Jamie Raskin introduced legislation in the 118th Congress related to enforcing Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which bars individuals who engaged in insurrection from holding federal office.

  • The Washington Post

    Rep. Raskin publicly argued that Section 3 of the 14th Amendment disqualifies Trump from the presidency due to his role in the January 6, 2021 Capitol attack, and he actively promoted this legal theory in Congress and in public statements.

  • NPR

    Raskin was among the most vocal congressional advocates for applying Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to disqualify Trump, co-authoring op-eds and making floor speeches on the subject.

  • Politico

    Raskin introduced a resolution in the House calling on Congress to formally declare Trump disqualified from holding office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.

  • Supreme Court of the United States - Trump v. Anderson (2024)

    The Supreme Court ultimately ruled unanimously in Trump v. Anderson (March 2024) that states cannot unilaterally enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment against federal candidates, effectively ending the legal challenges to Trump's candidacy on those grounds.

TellWell AI

Related debunks