Yes, Both Russia and the United States Have Withdrawn from the INF Treaty — It Collapsed in 2019
“Russia and the United States have withdrawn from the INF Treaty”
The argument in brief
The claim is true. Both the United States and Russia withdrew from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty in 2019, ending a landmark Cold War arms control agreement. The U.S. formally exited on August 2, 2019, citing Russia's development of the 9M729 cruise missile as a material breach of the treaty.
Data: U.S. State Department / Arms Control Association
Why it spread
People shared this claim because it reflects a genuine and alarming geopolitical reality. Concerns about nuclear weapons and deteriorating U.S.-Russia relations are widespread, and the collapse of a major arms control treaty feels like exactly the kind of news that confirms those fears. It spread easily because it is true, consequential, and fits a larger story many people were already following.
The claim is accurate and well-documented. The INF Treaty, signed by Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev in 1987, banned ground-launched missiles with ranges between 500 and 5,500 kilometers. It was one of the most significant arms control agreements of the 20th century. As of August 2, 2019, it no longer exists.
The U.S. Department of State confirmed that Washington formally withdrew on August 2, 2019, after giving the required six-month notice in February of that year. The core U.S. accusation was that Russia's 9M729 cruise missile — known in NATO circles as the SSC-8 — fell squarely within the range the treaty prohibited. Russia denied this, and countered with its own accusations of U.S. violations.
Russia did not wait passively. BBC News reported that Moscow suspended its own participation in the treaty in February 2019, shortly after the U.S. announced its intent to withdraw. The Arms Control Association confirmed that both nations had effectively abandoned the agreement by mid-2019, with mutual accusations of bad faith on both sides.
NATO backed the U.S. position, with the alliance formally concluding that Russia's 9M729 missile constituted a material breach. Reuters reported the final withdrawal on the day it happened, marking the end of an agreement that had been in force for over three decades. The collapse was not sudden — it had been building since at least 2014, when the Obama administration first formally accused Russia of violations.
This story spread widely because it is both true and significant. The end of the INF Treaty represents a real setback for nuclear arms control, and it feeds into legitimate public anxiety about a new arms race between major powers. The nuance worth keeping in mind: both sides bear responsibility for the breakdown, and the full picture is more complicated than either government's official narrative.
Sources
- U.S. Department of State
The United States formally withdrew from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty on August 2, 2019, after providing the required six-month notice in February 2019, citing Russia's material breach of the treaty through development and deployment of the 9M729 missile.
- BBC News
The INF Treaty officially collapsed on August 2, 2019, after the U.S. withdrew. Russia had also suspended its participation in the treaty in February 2019, following the U.S. announcement of its intent to withdraw.
- Arms Control Association
Both the U.S. and Russia withdrew from the 1987 INF Treaty in 2019. The U.S. accused Russia of violating the treaty with its 9M729 (SSC-8) cruise missile, while Russia denied the violation and accused the U.S. of its own breaches.
- NATO
NATO allies supported the U.S. withdrawal from the INF Treaty, concluding that Russia had developed and fielded a non-compliant missile system (9M729), which constituted a material breach of the treaty.
- Reuters
Reuters reported on August 2, 2019 that the U.S. officially withdrew from the INF Treaty, ending a landmark Cold War-era arms control agreement that had been in force since 1988.
Related debunks
- UnverifiableYes, Jamie Raskin Was Involved in Both Trump Impeachments — Here's What Each Role Looked Like
- Partially FalseNo, the EU Migration Pact Was Not 'Implemented Across All 27 States' on a Friday Deadline — Here's What Actually Happened
- Partially FalsePartially False: The EU Pact Does Include a ~Three-Month Border Procedure, But It's Not Quite What's Being Claimed