TellWell
← Misinformation tracker
Partially FalseNews · General

Technically True but Deeply Misleading — ICE's 'Criminal' Label Covers Far More Than You Think

Nearly 70% of ICE arrests involve individuals classified by DHS as criminal illegal aliens

The argument in brief

The claim that nearly 70% of ICE arrests involve criminal illegal aliens is loosely supported by ICE's own numbers, but it's misleading because ICE's definition of 'criminal' is so broad it includes minor traffic violations and charges that never led to a conviction. When researchers narrow the definition to serious or violent offenses, the share drops substantially. The number is real; what it means is not what most people assume.

The numbersICE Arrests with Criminal Convictions or Charges as % of Total Arrests by Fiscal Year

Data: ICE Annual Reports, FY2017–FY2023

Why it spread

This claim gives people who support aggressive immigration enforcement a morally tidy story: ICE is catching criminals, so the arrests are justified. An official-sounding statistic from DHS lends it credibility, and most people sharing it never dig into what 'criminal' actually means in ICE's own paperwork. The vagueness is invisible unless you go looking for it.

The claim is that roughly 70% of people ICE arrests are classified as criminal illegal aliens by DHS. ICE's own annual reports do show figures in that ballpark — 64% in FY2022 and 73% in FY2023, according to ICE Fiscal Year Annual Reports. So the statistic isn't invented. But the word 'criminal' is doing enormous heavy lifting here, and that's where the claim falls apart.

ICE's definition of 'criminal' is extraordinarily broad. As the American Immigration Council documents, it includes people with minor traffic violations, low-level misdemeanors, and even pending charges that have never resulted in a conviction. Someone ticketed for driving without a license can appear in ICE's data as a 'criminal alien.' That is a very different picture than the dangerous offenders the label implies.

Researchers at the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) at Syracuse University found that a significant share of arrests labeled 'criminal' involve only minor offenses or immigration violations themselves — not serious crimes. The Migration Policy Institute similarly found that the percentage of arrests involving genuinely serious criminals varies widely depending on which administration sets enforcement priorities. The DHS Office of Inspector General has also flagged inconsistencies in how ICE classifies and reports this data, raising further doubts about the reliability of the headline figure.

The number also shifts year to year — from 64% to 78% across recent fiscal years — which means a static '70%' claim is an oversimplification of a moving target shaped more by policy choices than by the actual criminal histories of people being arrested.

This claim spreads because it sounds authoritative — it cites a government agency and uses a precise-sounding percentage. But precision in a number doesn't mean precision in a definition. When you see immigration statistics that use the word 'criminal' without explaining what that includes, treat it as a red flag. The definition matters as much as the number.

Sources

  • ICE Fiscal Year 2023 Annual Report

    In FY2023, ICE reported 170,590 total arrests. Of those, approximately 73% (about 125,440) had criminal convictions or pending criminal charges, but this figure includes a broad definition of 'criminal' that encompasses minor offenses and traffic violations.

  • ICE Fiscal Year 2022 Annual Report

    In FY2022, ICE made 143,408 arrests, with about 64% having criminal convictions or pending charges. The percentage fluctuates year to year and depends heavily on enforcement priorities set by the current administration.

  • American Immigration Council

    ICE's definition of 'criminal' is broad and includes individuals with only minor or non-violent offenses, traffic violations, or pending charges that have not resulted in convictions, making the 'criminal' label misleading to the public.

  • Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC), Syracuse University

    TRAC data shows that a significant portion of ICE arrests categorized as 'criminal' involve individuals with only minor offenses or immigration violations themselves classified as criminal, not serious violent crimes. The share of those with serious criminal records is substantially lower than headline figures suggest.

  • Migration Policy Institute

    MPI analysis found that ICE enforcement priorities and definitions of 'criminal alien' have shifted across administrations, and the percentage of arrests involving serious criminals varies widely. Under some administrations, non-criminal arrests have risen sharply.

  • DHS Office of Inspector General

    OIG reviews have noted inconsistencies in how ICE classifies and reports criminal history data, raising questions about the reliability of aggregate statistics on criminal versus non-criminal arrests.

TellWell AI

Related debunks