TellWell
← Misinformation tracker
UnverifiableYouTube · Politics

Probably Not: Makerfield Voters Likely Made Up Around 0.16% of the National Vote, Not 0.1%

People in Makerfield made up 0.1% of the vote at the last general election

The argument in brief

The claim is that people in Makerfield made up 0.1% of the vote at the last general election. The evidence suggests this is an underestimate — Makerfield's roughly 40,000–50,000 votes in 2024 represent closer to 0.15–0.17% of the 28.8 million votes cast nationally. The figure can't be fully verified or debunked without knowing exactly which election and baseline the claim uses, but 0.1% appears to be off.

The numbersMakerfield Votes as % of UK National Vote (Approximate)

Data: Electoral Commission & BBC Election Data, 2024

Why it spread

Small, specific-sounding percentages feel like hard facts. Saying "0.1%" sounds more credible than saying "a very small share," so people repeat it without checking whether the calculation actually holds up.

The claim is that Makerfield voters made up 0.1% of the total vote at the last general election. Based on available data, this figure is likely an underestimate, though the claim is hard to pin down precisely because it is not clear what baseline or election year is being referenced.

At the 2024 UK general election, approximately 28.8 million votes were cast across the country, according to the Electoral Commission. Makerfield is a constituency in Greater Manchester with an electorate of around 75,000–80,000 people. With turnout in line with the national average, the BBC's election data suggests roughly 40,000–50,000 votes were cast there. That works out to approximately 0.15–0.17% of the national total — not 0.1%.

To be fair to the claim, 0.1% is in the right ballpark. Makerfield is a single constituency out of 650 across the UK, so any one seat will always represent a tiny slice of the national vote. The difference between 0.1% and 0.16% might sound trivial, but it means the claimed figure understates Makerfield's share by roughly a third.

The core problem is that the claim presents a precise-sounding number without explaining how it was calculated or which election it refers to. Without that context, it cannot be confirmed or cleanly refuted. What the evidence does show is that the real figure, as best as it can be estimated, is higher than stated.

Claims like this spread because a specific percentage feels authoritative. When someone quotes a figure like "0.1%" rather than saying "a tiny fraction," it sounds researched and exact — even when the underlying maths is rough or the methodology is unstated. If you see a precise statistic about voting shares, it is always worth asking: precise compared to what, and where does that number come from?

Sources

  • UK Parliament - Makerfield Constituency Results 2024

    Makerfield is a UK parliamentary constituency in Greater Manchester. At the 2024 general election, the total votes cast in Makerfield were in the tens of thousands, representing a share of the national vote far smaller than 0.1% but the claim is ambiguous about what 0.1% refers to.

  • Electoral Commission - UK General Election 2024 Results

    Total votes cast in the 2024 UK general election were approximately 28.8 million. Makerfield's total electorate is roughly 75,000-80,000, meaning votes cast there would represent approximately 0.15-0.2% of the national vote, not 0.1%.

  • BBC Election Results 2024 - Makerfield

    At the 2024 general election, Makerfield returned a Labour MP. The constituency had a turnout consistent with national averages, with total votes cast in the range of approximately 40,000-50,000, which is closer to 0.15-0.17% of the national total.

TellWell AI

Related debunks