Partially False: Trump Didn't 'Secure' the 2026 World Cup — FIFA's Member Nations Did
“President Trump secured the FIFA World Cup award for North America during his first presidency”
The argument in brief
The claim that Trump secured the 2026 FIFA World Cup for North America overstates his role. The hosting rights were awarded by a vote of FIFA's 211 member federations in June 2018, and the bid was organized by the U.S., Canadian, and Mexican soccer federations — not the Trump administration. Trump sent a supportive video message, but his immigration policies actually complicated the bid.
Data: FIFA 68th Congress, Moscow, 2018
Why it spread
It's genuinely easy to assume that a president gets credit for big national wins that happen during their term — that's how political storytelling works. Trump was visible, vocal, and in office when the announcement came, so the mental shortcut of 'he was there, he did it' feels intuitive, even when the facts don't support it.
The claim is that President Trump personally secured the 2026 FIFA World Cup for North America during his first term. The truth is more complicated: the award happened on his watch, but he didn't win it — FIFA did the deciding, and soccer officials did the work.
On June 13, 2018, FIFA's 68th Congress in Moscow voted 134 to 65 to award the 2026 World Cup to the joint United 2026 bid from the USA, Canada, and Mexico, according to FIFA's official announcement. That's a decisive win, but the voters were FIFA's member associations — not any government, and certainly not one leader.
The bid itself was built and led by U.S. Soccer, Canada Soccer, and the Mexican Football Federation, according to the U.S. Soccer Federation. The formal bid was submitted in 2017, but the groundwork was laid years before Trump took office. His administration contributed a letter of support, and Trump recorded a video endorsement — that's the extent of his direct involvement.
If anything, Trump's policies created headwinds, not tailwinds. Reuters reported that his travel bans and anti-immigration rhetoric raised serious concerns among FIFA voters about whether players and fans from certain countries would be able to get visas to enter the United States. The bid committee had to provide explicit government assurances on visa access to keep the bid on track. The Guardian confirmed that the award was a FIFA decision, not a political one.
This kind of claim spreads because timing gets mistaken for causation. A major win happened while Trump was president, so supporters naturally credit him. But being in office when something good happens is not the same as making it happen — especially when the actual decision-makers were an international sports body and three independent soccer federations.
Sources
- FIFA Official Announcement
The 2026 FIFA World Cup hosting rights were awarded to the United 2026 bid (USA, Canada, Mexico) on June 13, 2018, by a vote of FIFA member associations at the 68th FIFA Congress in Moscow, Russia.
- Associated Press
The joint bid by the United States, Canada, and Mexico won the hosting rights with 134 votes against Morocco's 65 votes. The decision was made by FIFA's 211 member federations, not by any individual political leader.
- The Guardian
While the bid was submitted and voted on during Trump's first term, the United 2026 bid was developed and led by the U.S. Soccer Federation, not the Trump administration. Trump did send a video message of support, but the award was a FIFA decision.
- U.S. Soccer Federation
The United 2026 bid was spearheaded by U.S. Soccer, Canada Soccer, and the Mexican Football Federation. The bid process began years before Trump took office, with the formal bid submitted in 2017.
- Reuters
Trump's administration did provide a letter of support for the bid, but analysts noted his earlier travel ban policies and anti-immigration rhetoric had actually complicated the bid and raised concerns among FIFA voters about visa access for players and fans.
Related debunks
- UnverifiableYes, Jamie Raskin Was Involved in Both Trump Impeachments — Here's What Each Role Looked Like
- Partially FalseNo, the EU Migration Pact Was Not 'Implemented Across All 27 States' on a Friday Deadline — Here's What Actually Happened
- Partially FalsePartially False: The EU Pact Does Include a ~Three-Month Border Procedure, But It's Not Quite What's Being Claimed