No, Trump Did Not Pick Bill Pulte to Replace Tulsi Gabbard as Acting DNI — The Claim Is False
“President Trump received backlash after initially selecting Bill Pulte to replace Tulsi Gabbard as acting director of national intelligence”
The argument in brief
A claim circulating online says President Trump faced backlash after selecting Bill Pulte to replace Tulsi Gabbard as acting director of national intelligence. This is false. Gabbard was confirmed as DNI in February 2025 and has not been replaced, and Bill Pulte was confirmed to lead a housing finance agency — a completely unrelated role.
Why it spread
The claim blends real, recognizable names with the kind of chaotic personnel drama that people already associate with the Trump administration. For readers skeptical of those appointments, a story about a surprise intelligence shake-up feels entirely believable — which is exactly what makes it easy to share before verifying.
The claim states that Trump selected Bill Pulte to replace Tulsi Gabbard as acting director of national intelligence and faced public backlash for it. Nearly every part of that sentence is wrong.
First, Gabbard has not been replaced. According to Reuters and NBC News, she was nominated and then confirmed by the Senate as Director of National Intelligence in February 2025. She has served in that role since. There is no credible reporting from any outlet — including AP News — of her being removed or stepping down.
Second, Bill Pulte has no connection to the intelligence community. Politico and other outlets confirm that Pulte was nominated and confirmed as director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the regulator that oversees mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. That is a housing finance job, not a national security one.
The claim essentially takes two real people, assigns them to the wrong jobs, and invents a personnel drama that never happened. AP News found no credible reporting of Trump ever selecting Pulte for any intelligence role whatsoever. The strongest version of this claim — that there was some internal discussion about a shake-up — also has no sourcing to support it.
Stories like this spread because they feel plausible on the surface. Real names, real titles, real political tension — mix them together and a false claim can look like breaking news. If you see a dramatic personnel story about national security, check whether major outlets like Reuters, AP, or NBC are reporting it. If none of them are, that silence is itself the story.
Sources
- Reuters
Tulsi Gabbard was nominated and confirmed as Director of National Intelligence, not replaced by Bill Pulte.
- NBC News
Tulsi Gabbard was confirmed as Director of National Intelligence by the Senate in February 2025 and has served in that role.
- Politico
Bill Pulte was nominated and confirmed as director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), not as any intelligence role.
- AP News
There is no credible reporting of Tulsi Gabbard being replaced as DNI or of Bill Pulte being selected for any intelligence directorship role.
Related debunks
- Partially FalseNo, Tren de Aragua Did Not Operate Under Maduro's Direct Control — Here's What the Evidence Actually Shows
- UnverifiableYes, US Intelligence Contradicted Claims That Maduro Controls Tren de Aragua — Here's What the Assessment Actually Found
- FalseNo, US Southern Command Did Not Kill Tren de Aragua's Leader in an Airstrike — Venezuelan Forces Did