No, the 2020 Election Was Not Stolen — Every Investigation Found the Same Thing
“The 2020 US presidential election was stolen through widespread voter fraud.”
Why it spread
Losing an election is hard to accept, especially when a trusted leader insists the result was stolen. The claim tapped into real distrust of institutions and spread through media ecosystems where the mountain of contradicting evidence was rarely shown. Repetition by a sitting president made it feel credible to millions of people who had no reason to doubt him.
The claim that widespread voter fraud handed Joe Biden the 2020 presidential election is false. Joe Biden won 306 electoral votes and more than 81 million popular votes. Every credible investigation — by federal agencies, state officials from both parties, the courts, and independent researchers — found no evidence of fraud large enough to change the outcome.
The people who would know found nothing. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) — led by a Trump appointee — called the 2020 election "the most secure in American history" and found no evidence votes were changed or deleted. Trump's own Attorney General, William Barr, publicly stated the DOJ found no widespread fraud that would have altered the result. An Associated Press review of every potential fraud case across six disputed battleground states found fewer than 475 suspicious ballots out of 25.5 million cast — a rounding error, not a conspiracy.
The courts agreed, repeatedly. Over 60 lawsuits filed by Trump and his allies were dismissed or rejected, including by judges appointed by Republican presidents, because no credible evidence was presented. Even a Republican-led Senate investigation reached the same conclusion. The Brennan Center for Justice notes that documented voter fraud rates across U.S. elections range from 0.00004% to 0.0025% — vanishingly rare by any measure.
This claim spread because it was repeated constantly by a sitting president and amplified in media spaces where contradicting facts rarely appeared. When people feel strongly about an outcome, it can be easier to believe the system was rigged than to accept a loss. That's a very human response — but it's worth knowing that in this case, the people Trump himself appointed looked hard for fraud and came up empty.
Sources
- Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA)
CISA, led by a Trump appointee, issued a joint statement with election officials calling the 2020 election 'the most secure in American history' and finding no evidence that votes were changed or deleted.
- Associated Press Review
An AP review of every potential case of voter fraud in the six battleground states disputed by Trump found fewer than 475 cases of potential fraud out of 25.5 million votes cast — nowhere near enough to affect the outcome.
- U.S. Department of Justice
Attorney General William Barr, appointed by Trump, stated in December 2020 that the DOJ found no evidence of widespread fraud that would have changed the election outcome.
- Federal Courts (Multiple Jurisdictions)
Over 60 post-election lawsuits filed by Trump and allies were dismissed or rejected by courts, including by judges appointed by Republican presidents, due to lack of credible evidence of fraud.
- Brennan Center for Justice
Research consistently shows voter fraud in U.S. elections is exceedingly rare, with documented fraud rates of 0.00004% to 0.0025% across multiple studies.
- Senate Homeland Security Committee Report
Even the Republican-led Senate investigation found no evidence of widespread fraud sufficient to alter the 2020 presidential election results.
Aarav Jindal
Support this creator's fact-checking