Working-class communities opposing data centers at five times the rate of wealthy neighborhoods
A new analysis found that working-class communities are opposing data center projects at significantly higher rates than wealthy neighborhoods, with resistance concentrated in areas with median incomes between $8,000 and $72,000. The opposition appears driven primarily by local residents rather than environmentalists or NIMBY concerns, contradicting some political narratives. Projects facing local resistance are six times more likely to be cancelled or delayed, suggesting grassroots opposition is achieving tangible results.
Research compiled by Brian Merchant and researcher Geoff Holtzman analyzed polling data and reporting on anti-data center movements across the United States, revealing that working-class neighborhoods are the primary drivers of opposition to data center projects. The analysis found the highest resistance rates in neighborhoods with median household incomes between $8,000 and $72,000, while the lowest resistance came from neighborhoods with incomes between $133,000 and $250,000. In working-class areas where projects faced local opposition, nearly one-third were cancelled or delayed, compared to just over 5% in areas without notable pushback. The findings contradict arguments attributing the movement to environmental activists or property value concerns, and dispute claims that the opposition represents a foreign influence campaign. Data centers are typically located in working-class areas due to low land costs and existing energy infrastructure, factors that also correlate with communities most vulnerable to job displacement from artificial intelligence.
What's missing
The article does not provide perspectives from data center companies, energy providers, or economic development advocates who might argue these projects bring jobs and infrastructure benefits. Additionally, there is limited discussion of the specific environmental or infrastructure concerns driving opposition beyond general economic factors.
How coverage differed
TechRadar's framing emphasizes the effectiveness and legitimacy of working-class resistance ("punch up," "super effective"), presenting the movement as a positive grassroots phenomenon. The source explicitly counters alternative narratives (NIMBY, Chinese influence) while highlighting the economic vulnerability of affected communities, which could be seen as sympathetic framing toward the opposition movement.
What different sources said
- TechRadarCenter
The working class are rallying to oppose data centers at 5 times the rate of wealthy neighborhoods – the great unifier is helping workers punch up, and its super effective
Related
Paris Hilton Launches TikTok Series Highlighting AI-Generated Exploitation and Deepfake Risks
Paris Hilton debuted a new true crime docuseries called "Searching for Mr. Deepfakes" on her TikTok channel to raise awareness about explicit AI-generated images and their potential harms. The series addresses deepfake technology and non-consensual synthetic media, issues that have increasingly affected public figures and private individuals. Hilton's high-profile effort aims to educate younger audiences about the dangers of AI-generated exploitation.
CISA Orders Federal Agencies to Patch Critical VPN Vulnerability Exploited by Ransomware Gang
The U.S. cybersecurity agency CISA has ordered all civilian federal agencies to patch a critical vulnerability in Check Point security tools within three days after a ransomware group called Qilin began actively exploiting it. The flaw affects VPNs, firewalls, and remote access tools used across the federal government and has been under active exploitation since May 7, with activity accelerating recently. The emergency directive underscores the severity of the threat to critical government infrastructure and demonstrates how vulnerabilities in widely-used security products can create cascading risks across multiple organizations.
Fitbit Charge 6, Ace LTE, and new Air all priced around $100 with current discounts
Fitbit is offering significant discounts on three wearable devices—the Charge 6, Ace LTE, and newly released Air—bringing them all to approximately $100. The devices serve different purposes: the Air is a simple health tracker, the Charge 6 is a feature-rich fitness tracker with smartwatch capabilities, and the Ace LTE is designed for children. The price parity creates an opportunity for consumers to choose based on features rather than cost.