U.S. Military Spending and War Outcomes: A Historical Analysis
A Salon opinion piece argues that despite massive military spending, the United States has not achieved decisive victory in any major conflict since World War II, from Korea through Afghanistan to recent Middle East operations. The article traces this pattern across eight decades of American military interventions, noting that Pentagon budgets have risen to nearly $1 trillion while military outcomes have become increasingly unsuccessful. The piece suggests this disconnect between spending and results represents a significant failure in American foreign policy and military strategy.
The article presents a historical critique of U.S. military effectiveness, cataloging conflicts from the Korean War (described as a draw) through Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, and recent operations in the Middle East and Africa. The author emphasizes that despite the U.S. possessing the world's most powerful military—with a budget nearly three times that of China—it has failed to achieve decisive victories against significantly weaker adversaries. The piece notes that Pentagon spending has increased substantially over this period, with the author citing Trump's proposals for additional military budget increases. The article concludes by suggesting that increased military expenditure has correlated with increasingly disastrous military outcomes, and briefly references Russia's war in Ukraine as another example of a major power struggling in prolonged conflict.
What's missing
The article lacks specific definitions of 'victory' and 'defeat' in modern asymmetrical warfare contexts, making some historical characterizations debatable. Additionally, the piece does not address counterarguments regarding strategic objectives beyond traditional territorial conquest, humanitarian interventions, or the role of political constraints on military operations. The claim about 'more than 60 random boats' being 'blasted out of the water' lacks specific sourcing or context.
What different sources said
- SalonLeft
The more America spends on war, the worse it gets
Related
UK Wins International Arbitration Case Over Scrapped Rwanda Asylum Deportation Deal
The Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague ruled against Rwanda's appeal for compensation after the UK canceled its controversial plan to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda. Rwanda had sought two annual payments of 50 billion pounds (approximately €58 billion or $67 billion) for 2025 and 2026, claiming the UK government still owed them under the original agreement. The ruling is significant as it resolves a major financial dispute over a policy that faced domestic legal challenges, cost approximately 700 million pounds, and resulted in only four voluntary deportations before being scrapped by Prime Minister Keir Starmer in 2024.
French State Faces Criticism Over Child Protection Failures
France's government is under scrutiny for its handling of child protection issues, with Justice Minister Gérald Darmanin addressing prosecutors following a working meeting on June 8, 2026. The criticism reflects broader concerns about the effectiveness of France's child safeguarding systems and institutional responses. This matters as child protection is a fundamental state responsibility that affects public confidence in government institutions.
Maine Holds Primary Elections for Senate, House, and Governor with High-Profile Candidates
Maine held primary elections on Tuesday for U.S. Senate, House, and gubernatorial races that will shape the state's competitive midterm general election. The races feature multiple candidates with prominent political family connections, including the son of an independent senator and the daughter of a congresswoman. Maine is expected to play a critical role in determining control of both chambers of Congress in November.