San Francisco Schools Superintendent Maria Su Testifies Before Congressional Committee on Curriculum Policies
San Francisco Unified School District Superintendent Maria Su testified before the House Committee on Education and the Workforce this week regarding the district's curriculum and policies. The hearing focused on contentious issues including COVID-related curriculum comparisons, transgender student policies, and parental notification procedures, with the district currently under Department of Justice investigation. The testimony reflects broader national debates over school curriculum, parental rights, and LGBTQ+ inclusion policies in public education.
San Francisco Unified School District Superintendent Maria Su appeared before the House Committee on Education and the Workforce to answer questions about the district's curriculum and policies. The hearing centered on several controversial topics, including allegations that the district's curriculum compared parents who rejected COVID mandates to white families who opposed school desegregation, guidance equating misgendering transgender students with physical assault, and policies regarding transgender students' access to facilities. Su declined to provide direct answers to several questions posed by committee members. The district is currently under investigation by the Department of Justice regarding potential violations of parental notification and opt-out laws. The hearing reflects ongoing national tensions between school administrators, parents, and lawmakers over curriculum content, parental rights, and LGBTQ+ inclusion policies in public schools.
What's missing
The specific questions asked by committee members and Su's actual responses are not fully detailed in either source. Neither article provides Su's perspective on why she declined to answer certain questions or her rationale for the district's policies. The nature and scope of the DOJ investigation are mentioned but not explained in detail.
How coverage differed
The New York Post frames Su's testimony as evasive and emblematic of ideological overreach in schools, using language like 'earned an F' and 'woke school brass,' while emphasizing low academic proficiency rates and questioning the prevalence of LGBTQ+ identification among students. The San Francisco Standard's headline suggests the superintendent 'survives' a hearing 'designed to embarrass her,' implying the committee's intent was partisan rather than investigative.
What different sources said
SF school chief survives congressional grilling designed to embarrass her
- New York PostRight
Woke San Francisco schools chief looks foolish on national stage
Related
Makerfield Voters Face Consequential By-Election Amid Mixed Economic Fortunes
The Makerfield constituency in north-west England is holding a by-election on 18 June that could determine the next Labour leader, with Labour's Andy Burnham facing Reform UK's Robert Kenyon. While some areas show economic growth with above-average wages and new businesses, others suffer from persistent problems like illegal waste dumps and rat infestations. The by-election reflects broader voter frustration with the state of Britain, though residents' concerns vary significantly by neighbourhood.
72-year-old man charged with harassment over abusive emails to Singapore MP and town council staff
A 72-year-old Singaporean man was charged in court with six counts of harassment under the Protection From Harassment Act for sending abusive emails to an MP and town council employee between August 2025 and October 2025. The man, Manickam Manohar, allegedly sent nine emails to town council staff and five emails to MP Hany Soh, using insulting language and accusations of misconduct, and also posted notices with abusive content at public housing blocks. The case highlights Singapore's enforcement against harassment of public officers, with potential penalties including up to 12 months imprisonment and fines up to S$5,000.
Trump Pushes $350B Pentagon Reconciliation Bill With Elections Overhaul; Republicans Divided
President Trump has called on Republicans to pass a third reconciliation bill allocating $350 billion to the Pentagon while including the Save America Act, which addresses election-related provisions. The proposal comes as some Republican senators have expressed opposition to using reconciliation for defense spending. The bill's fate depends on GOP unity, as reconciliation requires only a simple majority but faces internal party resistance.