Federal Judge Blocks Paxton's Lawsuit Against ActBlue, Finding Retaliatory Motive

A federal judge in Massachusetts issued a preliminary injunction Thursday blocking Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton from continuing his lawsuit against Democratic fundraising platform ActBlue. U.S. District Judge Richard Stearns ruled the suit was filed in retaliation for ActBlue's fundraising on behalf of James Talarico, Paxton's opponent in the Texas Senate race, and found it likely infringed on ActBlue's First Amendment protections. The ruling marks a significant legal setback for Paxton and raises questions about the use of state attorney general powers against political opponents.
U.S. District Judge Richard Stearns granted ActBlue a preliminary injunction in a 15-page ruling, finding that Paxton's April lawsuit — which alleged ActBlue enabled fraudulent and foreign donations through lax vetting practices — was more likely an act of political retaliation than a legitimate consumer protection effort. Stearns wrote that the timing and Paxton's own public statements drew a clear connection between the lawsuit and his Senate candidacy against Talarico, noting the suit was filed shortly after Talarico recorded a $2 million fundraising day. The judge concluded the evidence compelled a finding of bad faith, ruling that the litigation was designed to suppress ActBlue's fundraising for Paxton's rival rather than protect Texas consumers. ActBlue, which is based in Massachusetts, had countersued in Boston, arguing the Texas lawsuit was 'rife with false and inflammatory allegations' and violated its First Amendment rights. Separately, ActBlue has faced broader Republican scrutiny over its donor-vetting practices, including concerns about foreign donations and the use of prepaid debit cards, and its CEO recently invoked Fifth Amendment rights at a congressional hearing. Paxton had initiated an investigation into ActBlue in 2023 at the request of then-candidate Donald Trump before formally filing suit this year.
What's missing
It is also unclear whether Paxton plans to appeal the injunction.
How coverage differed
The Washington Examiner devoted considerably more space to ActBlue's broader controversies — including congressional hearings, Fifth Amendment invocations, and a New York Times report on internal memos — framing the story within a wider Republican narrative about foreign donations, while UPI focused more narrowly on the legal ruling and its First Amendment rationale.
What different sources said
- UPICenter
Judge blocks suit by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton against ActBlue
- Washington ExaminerRight
Judge blocks Paxton from suing ActBlue over Talarico campaign concerns
Related

Spencer Pratt Claims Office Fire Was Arson, Alleges Political Retaliation After LA Mayoral Primary Loss
A fire broke out Thursday at Spencer Pratt's Pacific Palisades office, which he alleges was deliberate arson linked to his political activities. Pratt, who finished third in the Los Angeles mayoral primary, has been publicly attacking incumbent Mayor Karen Bass and Councilmember Nithya Raman, who advanced to the general election runoff. The incident adds a new dimension to Pratt's ongoing media campaign, which includes claims of a secret recording he says could force one of the candidates to resign.

Poll Shows Growing Support for Deportations as Debate Continues Over Who Is Being Removed
A new Harvard/Harris poll finds 80% of voters support deporting immigrants who have committed crimes, up from 75% in April, with Democratic support rising 8 points to 71%. The survey comes amid an ongoing debate over the composition of those being detained and deported under the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. The findings highlight shifting public opinion on immigration enforcement even as questions persist about the criminal backgrounds of those being removed.
NSW ICAC Inquiry Exposes Alleged Corruption by City of Parramatta's 'Pink Ladies' Network
A five-week public inquiry by the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) has examined misconduct allegations against former City of Parramatta CEO Gail Connolly and two senior colleagues, Roxanne Thornton and Angela Jones-Blayney, who were part of a social group called the Pink Ladies. The women face allegations including manipulating hiring processes, conducting covert surveillance on staff and a councillor, misusing public funds, and improperly terminating employees. The inquiry could result in formal corrupt conduct findings against the women, with two still on paid leave from the council.